An important intermission alert

I have heard and had confirmed that Senate Bill S 510 the “Food Safety Modernization Act” is due to go for a cloture vote next week. Cloture can be filibustered, and Senator Coburn of Oklahoma has previously stated that he would do just that….But he will need help.

In a nutshell, S510 is effectively NAIS for everything. It is a tremendous amount of additional enforcement (fines and penalties, license revocations, further license requirements, control over processes and harvest) are definite issues with the bill as it currently exists. However, not unlike the “Health Care” bill, they will have to pass this to see what it actually does.

Here’s why….In S 510, the FDA is instructed to follow all international agreements. One of the issues with international ‘guidelines and standards’ is “good agricultural practices”. Well those are not necessarily good. Most GAP certifying bodies have checklists about 25 pages long for growers to follow. They all require traceability (ie. NAIS) they also require auditing, verifying and certifying the processes used to produce a consumable product for human or animal feed. Every step in GAP costs the grower of food money and a good deal of paperwork. What happens if you’re better at growing food than filing forms? You will be penalized….ie more money. Sec 420 is exceptionally dangerous in my eyes. It subjects all farms that ‘produce’ milk to risk assessment and management…ie. insurance.

The idea that exemptions will be helpful is rose colored glasses thinking. Exemptions can easily be taken away or modified without Congressional oversight through the regulatory process. Most farmers aren’t watching the Federal Register like hawks.

The FDA has plenty of authority to protect the anonymous food supply already. But they don’t. Instead, they put small entities out of business through HACCP (also to be expanded in this bill) and heavier regulations that are not helpful to smaller economies of scale. The FDA inspects less than 1% of imported produce, has performed inspections on less than 25% of processing facilities that they are authorized to inspect (in a five year period) and they ALREADY have authority over live food animals on the farm. The USDA authority is over animal disease.

Please, call your Senators and tell them to go with Coburn on stopping this bill from coming to the floor. Coburn has a list of objections and concerns with the bill listed on his website.

Send that to your Senator’s office, and tell them we don’t need another drop of regulation from an agency who has told us we don’t have the right to eat foods of our choice.

BTW, I am sending this out there asap, and if you want back up on my statements, you will need to download the newest version of the bill from Thomas or govtrack and read my articles on I’m in a hurry, so please forgive my failure to give you the massively easy button. Here’s the switchboard number for the senate:
(202) 224-3121

Just ask yourself when’s the last time the Feds gave highly expansive authority to an agency and it turned out to be good for freedom and good for the economy?


Sharon adds:

Earlier this morning, DownsizeDC sent out an alert regarding S510.  They make sending letters easy so I did this earlier this morning.

If you eat food, then S510 pertains to you.


One response to “An important intermission alert

  1. S510 May Mean 10 Years in Prison for Farmers

    A snippet from that article that ought to make you hair stand on end:

    Prison for Packaging

    There is a federal law called the Lacey Act. The Lacey Act prohibits the importation of seafood in violation of foreign laws, and imposes criminal penalties for its violation.

    A small group of businesspeople had been importing lobster tails from Honduras for ten years, without problems. Every shipment was passed by the FDA and Customs. In 1999 they were arrested and charged with violation of the Lacey Act. According to the government, they had violated Honduran law by packaging the frozen lobster tails in plastic, rather than cardboard. They were also accused of violating other provisions that turned out to pertain to turtles, not lobsters. These lobsters were not an endangered species.

    Read the full article here on hartkeisonline –

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s